Andrew Parks
2 - 4
10 - 199
InteractionComponents & Design

[pullshow/]Some of you will have heard of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, named for the famous US psychologist Abraham Maslow. It’s a psychological theory stating that all people have similar needs and similar priorities for them. First of all, there are the physiological needs like food and sleep. Then there is the need for safety, for belonging, for esteem and finally self-actualization, the need to improve yourself to the best of your abilities. This hierarchy of needs has almost nothing to do with today’s review. There is, however, another hierarchy of needs, one that allegedly applies to settlements. It goes like this: first you need water, then food, religion, defense, commerce and culture. Personally, I wouldn’t put religion below defense … or commerce … or 24/7 Chinese take-out, but we’re talking about the needs of a medieval city, so the hierarchy makes sense. Chinese take-out isn’t available, anyway. Let’s call this one Parks’ hierarchy of needs, for the not quite as famous but reasonably well-known game designer Andrew Parks.

This second hierarchy gets Parks’ name because it’s at the center of his Canterbury, where you, the players, have to fulfil those needs in the 25 districts of the city to gain fame, points, money and the King’s favour which, in the end, is also points. [pullthis]This is the very early middle ages, when King Ethelbert of Kent decided to establish his capital in the abandoned Roman city of Durovernum Cantiacorum. Canterbury.[/pullthis] There’s not much left of what the Romans built, only an old well in the central district. So at least there’s water in the center, that’s apparently enough for Ethelbert to pick the place, but not enough for him to move in. And that’s where you come in: you must now cater to the needs of the city, so the King can see to his need of showing off to the neighbours. Maslow missed that one, I guessed.

Roman Beginnings
Roman Beginnings

And so you start building the city, always keeping Parks’ hierarchy in mind: each building fulfils one of the needs on that scale, but a new building can only go into a district where all the more basic needs are met. A Garden can only be built where there is a working water supply. Only when there is food and water can you think about building a Chapel or a Church. And if you tried building a Marketplace for rich merchants in a neighbourhood where people don’t have food and water… well, that would make the people unhappy, their uprising would make the king unhappy, and his displeasure would certainly make you very unhappy.

Given the sorry state of your finances at the start of the game, this means that the only way to enter a new district is to build a Well there, the smallest and cheapest building supplying water. For all six services, as the game calls the needs of the city, there are three buildings that supply it. The smallest one takes one of the six spaces in a district, but supplies only that district. The medium, more expensive buildings supply their own district and the four adjacent ones. Once your money is sufficient to build those, you don’t have to start in each district by building a well. When a district gets water from somewhere else, it doesn’t need its own Well before you can build a Garden, as long as the need is met, no one really cares where the water comes from. The largest buildings, which take four spaces and are only available once for each service, are even more powerful than that, they supply their own district and up to five more anywhere on the board. Buildings and supplies don’t belong to anyone, so there’s nothing keeping your opponents from swooping into a district you supplied with some services from the outside and placing the first building there. In fact, that’s a rather common occurrence because the first player to place a building in a district scores the Breaking Ground Bonus of one point for each service available in the district. Sort of nice when someone supplied food, religion and defense already and you can take those bonus points building a measly Well.

 The Shadow of the Citadel
The Shadow of the Citadel

All those buildings serve a purpose for the city, of course, but their primary purpose for you is probably not hard to guess: they are all worth points. From a measly one point for the Well up to about a gazillion points – or 45, if you’re into more mundane but real numbers – for the Town Square, the large culture building. But for each building the city itself scores points as well, and while your points are obviously important in the end, it’s the cities score that you should really keep your eyes on. It controls two things in Cantebury: the game’s timing and your finances.

You obviously need money to expand the city. You didn’t think anything was free, did you? As a saxon lord serving only the King, you don’t get your hands dirty to earn money, you levy taxes. Levying Funds is one of three actions you can pick on your turn. The money you get from the supply depends on the city’s score – a richer city pays more taxes – and goes from five coins at the start of the game up to 35 at the end. When you levied funds, you have to take a Full Build action on your next turn. That is, you have to place buildings as described above, one or two small or medium ones or one large one. The third possible action is for the undecided players and does a bit of both: you collect half the money you would get on Levy Funds and then build only one building. Sounds pretty useless, right? Either you take two turns to take money and build two buildings, or you take one turn to take less money and only build one building. Surely that’s the same in the end. But the difference between the two full actions and the mashed together half-and-half action is the key to playing Canterbury well, because it ties into the most important aspect of the game: timing.

 Canterbury Planning Bureau
Canterbury Planning Bureau

A lot depends on timing in this game, and the time is given by the city’s score. Not only does it tell you your income from taxation, it also triggers the two intermediate scorings at 100, 200 and 300 points and the game end one round after it reaches 300 points. And that’s where the timing aspect of the different actions comes into play. You don’t always have the luxury of spending two turns to levy funds first and build later, because later might be after the next scoring, and then it’s too late. In the intermediate scoring, points are awarded for district majorities: for each district, the player providing the most services scores one point for each space in that district covered by a building tile, the second player scores half that. And that’s why timing is so important, because being the player that triggers the intermediate scoring allows you to make some last minute adjustments to the majorities just before the count. Compared to that, taking a turn right after the scoring is not very attractive. You have a lot of control over the speed of the game, using it well is how you win.

The final scoring repeats the district majority scoring once more, but it also scores the King’s Bonus. For each of the six services, the player that provided it to the most districts scores a nice chunk of points, second in line scores a smaller chunk, both scores coming from a table that is adjusted every time someone provides a new service to the district. The King’s Bonus table is my one complaint about the otherwise great components of the game: on a board slightly bigger than an A4 piece of paper you have six scales, each with one counter cube per player. It’s almost impossible to adjust this thing without nudging some other cubes to places where they are not supposed to go, at least for me with my ring size 10 fingers. But I can ignore the fiddliness for the nice score boost at the end of the game.

The City Completed
The City Completed

Canterbury is an elaborate majority game where you score points for balancing the different majorities well. District bonuses are nice, the king’s bonuses are nice, if you can figure out the right move to advance in both, you’re on the way to victory. It’s not the first game where you juggle different majorities to win, but it’s a well made one with a good balance, and the strong element of timing improves it. Also, there is a good amount of interaction here, you have many ways to profit from what your opponents are doing and should always watch what they can do on their turn as well. There is only one thing that doesn’t work out quite as intended, the first player always seems to have a harder time than everyone else. We’re not exactly sure why, and it’s not so bad that the first player can’t win, but a few of our testers said that they struggled more as the first player. But despite that, I’m always willing to play more Canterbury. Even as the first player.

And what does all that have to do with Maslow? Well, Canterbury endangers you on multiple levels there. You’re not in any physiological danger, you will still get food, sleep and all that other stuff. But there’s no guarantee for your safety or sense of belonging, because you can get friends pretty angry in this game. On the other hand, your esteem may suffer from their actions, and I really didn’t feel well about my self-actualization when I didn’t win against the same people, no matter how often I tried. So, four out of five ruined. But the need for a good time while playing that Maslow overlooked in his hierarchy is satisfied.

Powered by Flickr Gallery


  1. Thanks so much for taking the time to review this game, which was for us developer-folks, a labor of love to create.

    The first player does have the disadvantage of making the least amount of money throughout the course of the game, at least, usually, but that can be minimized by keeping track of you opponents’ actions, and in general, trying to build after they collect, and collect after they build. Try also not to tax & build on a turn when city prosperity is odd, because even that half a coin lost to rounding can be important, and always take the best possible advantage of your biggest advantage, which is that if you can put prosperity over the century mark, District Favor is scored when you’ve had one more turn than everybody else; it may be possible to pull this off thrice during the game.

    Also, never full build twice in a row. That way lies the poor house.

    Thanks again!

  2. Thanks for the strategic advice! I really didn’t think much about the half coin from odd city prosperity, but I did lose games by one coin that I needed for my last building, so I’ll keep an eye on that.
    And it was a pleasure to review, we had (and still have) a lot of fun playing.

Leave a Reply