|Interaction||Components & Design|
Okay, that may be a bit vague, even by my standards of explaining rules, so here’s Qwixx in some more detail. One player rolls a handful of dice, and then all players may mark something on their score sheet. What? No, I tell you, it has nothing to do with Yahtzee! The score sheet only has four rows of numbers to mark, red and yellow counting up from two to twelve, blue and green counting down from twelve to two. Those colours, not by coincidence, match four of the six dice, the remaining two being white. After the active player rolls the dice, he announces the sum of the white dice and all players may mark that number in one of the four rows. The active player may, in addition to that, mark the sum of one of the white dice plus one of the coloured dice in the row of that colour. If the other players don’t want to mark anything, there’s nothing to force them, but if the active player won’t or can’t use either of his options, he must mark a failed roll that will cost him five points at the end of the game.
If you could just mark whatever number is rolled, then Qwixx would be even more boring than Yahtzee. It would actually combine the most boring parts of Yahtzee and Bingo. But I told you that Qwixx is a clever dice game, so here’s the kicker: you may never mark a number to the left of one already marked in the same row. All your marking activity must move strictly rightward. That’s where all the decision-making in Qwixx comes from. Marking a blue twelve when you can is a no-brainer. Marking a blue ten when you didn’t get the eleven or twelve yet? Not so much, because more marks in a row means more points at the end. Rolling only sevens and eights on your first roll as an active player, you really start thinking if you should mark one and hope for the best or just accept the failed roll and the associated malus but keep your options open. It’s definitely something to think about, because the score grows rapidly with each mark you make in a row. One mark gives you one point, four marks for ten, seven for 28 and all twelve marks for an amazing 78 points – which you absolutely deserve if you really managed to mark all the boxes in one row, or cheated without anyone noticing. (Technically, the score is the Triangular Number Tn of the number of marks n in your row – but I’m reviewing a game suitable for primary schoolers here, not teaching college level math.)
Keeping you from patiently and slowly marking all the boxes for an astronomic score is the fact that, sooner or later, the game will end. After a player marks five boxes in one row he may mark the last one (two or twelve, depending on colour) and with that close the row. No player may mark anything in that row any more, so closing rows where you score the most points is the safest way to win the game. Closing rows is also one of the ways to end the game: as soon as the second row is closed, the game ends immediately and you add up your scores, start crying and cursing and congratulate the winner. Alternatively, as soon as a player has to mark their fourth failed roll, the game also end with the same psychological trauma.
Ending the game is my biggest criticism on Qwixx, because it’s an excruciatingly slow process in most games. Twos and twelves are the rarest numbers with two dice, as pretty much everyone knows, and way to many games end with a slow and painful wait for someone to mark their final fail because no one manages to complete a row. And that’s a shame, because up to that slow ending I enjoy Qwixx. For a game this simple, it offers a nice amount of risk-management, some strategic options – mark as much as you can before the game ends, or go slowly and hope to mark more – and the tense decision every turn whether marking a number fits your strategy. And it keeps all players involved at all times, a big plus even in a quick game. Not to forget the opportunity to swear shamelessly when the next roll shows exactly the number you just skipped, something that happens much more often that your statistics teacher would believe. In the end, I do like Qwixx, but due to its extreme lightness and the slow ending I don’t think I Spiel-des-Jahres-like it.